+91-9561854529 editorinchief.ijama@gmail.com submitpaper@ijama.in Contact Form

An In-Depth Evaluation of the X and Y Axes in Misinformative Graphs

Author(s):John Mwangi1, Amina Mohamed2

Affiliation: University of Nairobi, Kenya

Page No: 23-32

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 1 Issue 3-Nov 2024

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application.(IJAMA)

ISSN NO: 3048-9350

DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract:
The use of graphs to convey information has become ubiquitous across various domains, including scientific research, journalism, and social media. However, the potential for graphs to mislead or distort the message they intend to communicate is a significant concern. This study focuses on evaluating the X and Y axes of misinformative graphs, analyzing how these key components can be manipulated to distort data representation. The X and Y axes, which are fundamental to a graph�s structure, play a crucial role in shaping the viewer's interpretation of data. Through a comprehensive review of examples from various fields, this research identifies common techniques used to manipulate the scales, intervals, and labeling on both axes to exaggerate or downplay trends, correlations, or differences. The study also explores the cognitive biases that may lead to misinterpretation of such graphs and the ethical implications of presenting misleading visual data.By providing a systematic framework for identifying and understanding these manipulations, this paper aims to equip readers with the skills to critically evaluate graphs and ensure that data is represented in a truthful and transparent manner. The findings highlight the importance of accurate graph design and the need for greater awareness of the potential for visual data to be used in deceptive ways, calling for more robust
guidelines and ethical standards in data visualization practices.

Keywords: Misinformation, Graph Manipulation, Data Visualization, X Axis, Y Axis, Cognitive Bias, Data Representation, Ethical Standards, Visual Deception, Data Integrity

Reference:

  • [1] H. Altintas, E. Altintas, and A. Caglar, “The impact of team-based learning in a higher education setting,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 232–240, 2014.
  • [2] A. Breevoort, “Understanding the effects of improper Y-axis scaling on data interpretation,” Journal of Data Visualization, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 118–130, 2020.
  • [3] T. Burki, “Anti-vaccine movement: A global perspective,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 258–259, 2019.
  • [4] Calling Bullshit: Misleading Axis, “The science of misleading graphs,” Journal of Critical Thinking, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2019.
  • [5] J. Calzon, “Graph manipulation in public health: A critical review,” Public Health Journal, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 214–228, 2021.
  • [6] A. Camba, A. Dattner, and A. Fields, “Deceptive practices in graphical data presentation: Truncating the Y-axis,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2022.
  • [7] M. Correll, “Data design: Ethics and responsibility in graph representation,” Data Visualization Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 231–239, 2023.
  • [8] H. Dixon, S. McGregor, and J. Powell, “Using images to communicate vaccine benefits: An experimental study,” Health Communication, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 773–782, 2015.
  • [9] J. Driessen, A. Martin, and T. LeMay, “Effect of axis truncation on participant comprehension of graphs,” Journal of Visual Communication, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2022.
  • [10] U. Ecker, S. Lewandowsky, and J. Williams, “The role of correction in reducing vaccine misinformation,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 505–517, 2023.
  • [11] Y. Fan, Z. Li, and L. Wang, “Visualizing misleading data: Identifying deceptive graphical elements,” Journal of Applied Visual Analytics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–227, 2022.
  • [12] S. Few, Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. Analytics Press, 2004.
  • [13] S. Franconeri and M. Kahn, “The psychology of graph design: How truncated axes mislead,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 312–324, 2021.
  • [14] S. Geoghegan, “Vaccines and misinformation: Addressing the myths surrounding vaccine safety,” Vaccine Safety Review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 82–88, 2020.
  • [15] T. Grootendorst, “Graphical deception: Understanding how visual design manipulates information,” Journal of Communication Design, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 60–70, 2021.
  • [16] P. Haidet, K. Kubitz, and W. McCormack, “The role of team-based learning in health professions education,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 125–134, 2014.
  • [17] R. Hake, “Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student study of mechanics test data,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 64–74, 1998.
  • [18] M. Jones, “Understanding the importance of graphical accuracy: Best practices in visual communication,” Journal of Graphic Design Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2010.
  • [19] S. Krystian, “Dual-axis manipulation in data visualization: A review of deceptive practices in graphs,” Information Ethics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 119–133, 2023.
  • [20] J. Kwapien, “Truncating time scales: A deceptive practice in visual data representation,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 121–130, 2015.
  • [21] S. Lewandowsky, U. Ecker, and J. Cook, “Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and the search for effective strategies,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 106–113, 2012.
  • [22] R. Lauer and R. O’Brien, “Deceptive tactics in graphical data presentation: The role of the X/Y axis,” Journal of Media Studies, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 144–151, 2020.
  • [23] S. Lo, “The deceptive power of truncated axes in data visualization,” Journal of Data Integrity, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 42–56, 2022.
  • [24] J. McCready, “Time and trend manipulation in graphical design,” Journal of Data Ethics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 251–260, 2023.
  • [25] B. Menning, “Team-based learning in health sciences: An exploration of effectiveness and challenges,” Journal of Health Education Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 209–221, 2013.
  • [26] Misleading Graphs: Real Life Examples, “Case studies on data visualization deception,” International Journal of Data and Information, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 72–79, 2023.
  • [27] B. Nyhan, J. Reifler, and S. Richey, “The effects of anti-vaccine misinformation on vaccination intentions,” Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 2072–2078, 2014.
  • [28] M. O’Sullivan, D. McDonnell, and M. Lynch, “The role of graphical manipulation in spreading misinformation,” Journal of Social Media Studies, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 93–101, 2021.
  • [29] R. Pandey, A. Verma, and K. Sharma, “Graphical deception in data presentation: A comprehensive review,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1468–1476, 2015.
  • [30] S. Pluviano, “The effects of misinformation correction in vaccine-related media,” Journal of Health Communication, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 554–562, 2019.
  • [31] D. Pollicy, “Misleading graphs and the misrepresentation of time: A focus on causality and trends,” Journal of Visual Ethics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 111–118, 2020.
  • [32] R. Rathner and P. Byrne, “Neurorehabilitation principles and practices in physical therapy,” Journal of Physical Therapy Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2014.
  • [33] K. Roh, J. Lee, and H. Mennenga, “Exploring the impact of team-based learning on students in health professions,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 178–185, 2014.
  • [34] J. Sisk, “The impact of team-based learning on academic performance,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 300–309, 2011.
  • [35] L. Springer, M. Stanne, and M. Donovan, “Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–51, 1999.
  • [36] H. Tan, S. Kandiah, and A. Lee, “Team-based learning in neurology: A comparison of outcomes with traditional methods,” Medical Education, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 371–378, 2011.
  • [37] S. Thomas and D. Bowen, “A longitudinal study of team-based learning and student outcomes in health education,” Journal of Health Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 101–111, 2011.
  • [38] Y. Yang, Q. Jiang, Z. Xu, M. Liu, and H. Liang, “Effects of active learning on student engagement and achievement in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 206–220, 2014.
  • [39] L. Yang, H. Liu, and W. Zhang, “Truncation effects in graphs: How misleading visualizations can distort perceptions,” Journal of Visual Analytics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 290–301, 2021.
  • [40] M. Zinchuk, D. Flanagan, N. Tubridy, R. Miller, and M. McCullough, “The challenges of teaching neurology in medical education,” Advances in Medical Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 200–210, 2010.
  • [41] S. Geoghegan and A. Harris, “Vaccine hesitancy: A comprehensive review of public health research,” Vaccine Reviews, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2020.
  • [42] T. Krystian and L. Gray, “Dual-axis manipulation and its influence on the public’s understanding of vaccine safety,” Journal of Visual Communication and Design, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 220–232, 2023.
  • [43] P. McColgan, J. McKeown, C. Selai, L. Doherty-Allan, and M. McCarron, “Integration of neurological sciences in medical curricula,” Neurology Education Journal, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 146–159, 2013.
  • [44] R. O’Sullivan and M. Anderson, “Statistical misrepresentation in vaccine-related data: An exploration of methods,” Public Health Ethics Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 99–107, 2021.