+91-9561854529 editorinchief.ijama@gmail.com submitpaper@ijama.in Contact Form

Integration of Digital Twin Technology with 3D Printing for Smart Construction

Author(s):Ritul Phukan1, Monalisa Daimari2, Anupam Kharghoria3, Biman Basumatary4

Affiliation: 1,2,3,4Department of Civil Engineering, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology, , India

Page No: 36-41

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 2 Issue 8 , Aug-2025

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application.(IJAMA)

ISSN NO: 3048-9350

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17582793

Download PDF

Article Indexing:

Abstract:
The convergence of digital twin technology and 3D printing has emerged as a transformative innovation in the construction sector, enabling real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and adaptive control in building processes. Digital twins provide virtual replicas of physical assets, allowing simulation and optimization throughout the lifecycle of a structure, while 3D printing offers flexible, material-efficient, and cost-effective methods of construction. The integration of these technologies creates a smart construction ecosystem that enhances design accuracy, reduces waste, and improves project sustainability. This paper examines the opportunities and challenges of integrating digital twins with 3D printing in construction. The study highlights applications such as automated design validation, real-time defect detection, performance prediction, and lifecycle management. Potential benefits include reduced construction time, improved quality control, and enhanced resilience of infrastructure. However, challenges such as interoperability issues, high initial investment, and lack of standardized protocols remain barriers to adoption. The paper proposes a conceptual framework that aligns digital twin�3D printing integration with smart construction goals, providing a foundation for future research and industry practice

Keywords: Digital Twin, 3D Printing, Smart Construction, Predictive Analytics, Sustainable Infrastructure

Reference:

  • 1. AbouRizk, S., Kenley, R., & Shi, J. (2020). Construction 4.0: Future outlook for the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 119, 103395.
  • 2. Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M. S., Zawawi, N. A. W. A., & Kennedy, I. B. (2020). Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 225�230.
  • 3. Bilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Qadir, J., Munir, K., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., & Pasha, M. (2016). Big Data in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities, and future trends. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(3), 500�521.
  • 4. Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179.
  • 5. Buswell, R. A., Leal de Silva, W. R., Jones, S. Z., & Dirrenberger, J. (2018). 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research. Cement and Concrete Research, 112, 37�49.
  • 6. Chen, K., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2015). Bridging BIM and building: From a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1405�1416.
  • 7. Ding, L., Zhong, B., Wu, S., Luo, H., & Ye, Y. (2016). Construction risk knowledge management in BIM using ontology and semantic web technology. Safety Science, 87, 202�213.
  • 8. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • 9. Gartner. (2021). Hype Cycle for Digital Twins. Gartner Research Report.
  • 10. Ghaffar, S. H., Corker, J., & Fan, M. (2018). Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution. Automation in Construction, 93, 1�11.
  • 11. Guo, H., Li, H., Skitmore, M., & Huang, T. (2017). A BIM-based simulation approach to identify potential safety risks in construction projects. Automation in Construction, 84, 20�34.
  • 12. Hou, L., Wang, X., & Truijens, M. (2015). Using augmented reality to facilitate piping assembly: An experiment-based evaluation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(1), 05014007.
  • 13. Jiang, F., Ma, L., & Wu, Z. (2021). Digital twin-driven smart construction: Research trends and future directions. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(8), 544�560.
  • 14. Khoshnevis, B. (2014). Automated construction by contour crafting�related robotics and information technologies. Automation in Construction, 13(1), 5�19.
  • 15. Li, J., Greenwood, D., & Kassem, M. (2019). Blockchain in the built environment: Analyzing current applications and developing an agenda for future research. Automation in Construction, 102, 288�307.
  • 16. Lu, W., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., & Li, H. (2012). Generic model for measuring benefits of BIM as a learning tool in construction tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 195�203.
  • 17. Mechtcherine, V., et al. (2019). Extrusion-based additive manufacturing with cement-based materials � Production steps, processes, and their underlying physics: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 119, 76�95.
  • 18. Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122, 103517.
  • 19. Rankohi, S., & Waugh, L. (2013). Review and analysis of augmented reality literature for building industry. Visualization in Engineering, 1(1), 9.
  • 20. Sacks, R., Eastman, C. M., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM Handbook (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • 21. Shafique, M., & Rafiq, M. (2019). Digital twin for smart construction: Review and future research directions. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(3), 221�232.
  • 22. Tay, Y. W. D., Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Noor Mohamed, N. A., Tan, M. J., & Leong, K. F. (2017). 3D printing trends in building and construction: A review. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12(3), 261�276.