+91-9561854529 editorinchief.ijama@gmail.com submitpaper@ijama.in Contact Form

Blockchain-Based Electronic Health Record Management Using Hyperledger Fabric and IPFS

Author(s):Deepak Ranjan Nayak, Pooja Thakur, Bimal Chandra Deka

Affiliation: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bihar Engineering University, Patna, Bihar, India Department of Information Technology, Jharkhand University of Technology, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Page No: 1-7

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2026

published on: 2026/06/01

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application.(IJAMA)

ISSN NO: 3048-9350

DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract:
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) represent a critical information infrastructure in modern healthcare, yet centralised EHR systems remain vulnerable to single-point-of-failure attacks, unauthorised access, data tampering, and lack of patient-controlled consent mechanisms. India's National Digital Health Mission (NDHM), launched in 2021 under the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) framework, mandates interoperability across 600,000+ health facilities through a federated health ID and linked health record architecture, creating an urgent need for tamper-evident, auditable, and privacy-preserving EHR management infrastructure. This paper proposes and evaluates a permissioned blockchain-based EHR management system built on Hyperledger Fabric 2.4 with InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) hybrid storage, implementing attribute-based access control (ABAC) smart contracts for fine-grained patient consent management. The proposed architecture stores cryptographic hashes and access control metadata on-chain while delegating encrypted EHR document storage to IPFS, achieving a 7.3× reduction in on-chain storage cost versus full on-chain storage. Performance benchmarking using Hyperledger Caliper demonstrates a sustained transaction throughput of 450 TPS with average confirmation latency of 28 ms at block size 50 — outperforming Ethereum PoW (14 TPS, 8,500 ms) and matching Hyperledger Fabric with Kafka consensus (520 TPS) at significantly lower infrastructure complexity. Security analysis across six attributes — data integrity, access control, auditability, privacy, availability, and non-repudiation — demonstrates superiority over centralised EHR alternatives on five of six dimensions. A six-month operational audit across three simulated hospital nodes records 99.2% authorised access compliance with 0.3% anomalous access attempts successfully detected and blocked by smart contract policy enforcement.

Keywords: blockchain, electronic health records, Hyperledger Fabric, IPFS, smart contracts, attribute-based access control, healthcare data security, ABDM, permissioned blockchain, PBFT consensus

Reference:

  • [1] Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., & Lippman, A. (2016). A case study for blockchain in healthcare: "MedRec" prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. Proceedings of the IEEE Open & Big Data Conference, 13.
  • [2] Hyperledger Foundation. (2023). Hyperledger Fabric Documentation v2.5. Linux Foundation.
  • [3] Kumar, R., & Tripathi, R. (2021). Scalable and secure access to IPFS-based healthcare system using blockchain. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 71, 101310.
  • [4] Mamoshina, P., Ojomoko, L., Yanovich, Y., Ostrovski, A., Botezatu, A., Prikhodko, P., ... & Zhavoronkov, A. (2018). Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare. Oncotarget, 9(5), 5665.
  • [5] MeitY. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.
  • [6] MoHFW. (2021). Operational Guidelines: Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • [7] Roehrs, A., Da Costa, C. A., Da Rosa Righi, R., Da Silva, V. F., Goldim, J. R., & Schmidt, D. C. (2019). Analyzing the performance of a blockchain-based personal health record implementation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 92, 103140.
  • [8] Shen, B., Guo, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). MedChain: Efficient healthcare data sharing via blockchain. Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1207.
  • [9] Wang, S., Wang, J., Wang, X., Qiu, T., Yuan, Y., Ouyang, L., ... & Wang, F. Y. (2018). Blockchain-powered parallel healthcare systems from the perspective of the ACP approach. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(4), 942-950.
  • [10] Xia, Q. I., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017). MeDShare: Trust-less medical data sharing among cloud service providers via blockchain. IEEE Access, 5, 14757-14767.
  • [11] Zhang, P., Schmidt, D. C., White, J., & Lenz, G. (2018). Blockchain technology use cases in healthcare. Advances in Computers, 111, 1-41.
  • [12] Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557-564.