International Journal of
Advanced Multidisciplinary Application

Volume 3, Issue 6

• Author(s)Monika Verma, Deepak Nath Tiwari, Avinash Chandra Tripathi
• AffiliationDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
• Page No.75-81
• Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 6, June 2026
• Published On2026/06/13
• JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
• ISSN No.3048-9350

Abstract

Natural fibre reinforced polymer (NFRP) composites have attracted significant research interest over the past two decades as sustainable alternatives to glass-fibre reinforced polymers in semi-structural applications, driven by natural fibres’ lower density (1.30–1.55 g/cm³ versus 2.54 g/cm³ for E-glass), renewable origin, CO₂ sequestration during growth, lower abrasive tool wear during machining, and end-of-life biodegradability. Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), a bast fibre crop cultivated extensively in Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Rajasthan, produces fibres with specific tensile strength approaching 60–70% of E-glass’s at one-half the density, making kenaf/epoxy composites theoretically competitive with glass-fibre laminates on a specific property basis. However, the inherently hydrophilic nature of kenaf cellulose—arising from abundant hydroxyl groups on the fibre surface—results in poor fibre-matrix interfacial adhesion in hydrophobic epoxy systems and significant moisture uptake that degrades mechanical properties under humid service conditions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two surface treatment protocols—sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 5 wt%, 2 h alkali treatment) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (silane, 1 wt% aqueous solution)—in improving the mechanical, hygroscopic, and thermomechanical performance of short kenaf fibre/epoxy composites at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 wt% fibre loadings. Flexural strength, Young’s modulus, Charpy impact strength, water absorption (Fickian diffusion analysis over 28 days), TGA, and DMA are characterised for all combinations. The silane-treated 20 wt% composite achieves optimal performance: flexural strength of 89 MPa (112% improvement over pure epoxy), Young’s modulus of 5.6 GPa, impact strength of 66 kJ/m², and 28-day water absorption of 1.06%—substantially reduced from 1.41% for the untreated equivalent. FTIR and SEM analysis confirm that both treatments successfully remove hemicellulose and surface wax, increasing surface roughness and hydroxyl-group reactivity, with silane coupling producing additional covalent Si-O-C bonds at the fibre-matrix interface.

Keywords: kenaf fibre, natural fibre reinforced polymer, epoxy composite, alkali treatment, silane treatment, water absorption, Fickian diffusion, DMA, TGA, FTIR

References

1. [1] Akil, H. M., et al. (2011). Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: A review. Materials & Design, 32(8–9), 4107–4121.
2. [2] Bledzki, A. K., & Gassan, J. (1999). Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Progress in Polymer Science, 24(2), 221–274.
3. [3] Dittenber, D. B., & GangaRao, H. V. S. (2012). Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Composites Part A, 43(8), 1419–1429.
4. [4] Doan, T. T. L., Brodowsky, H., & Mäder, E. (2012). Jute fibre/polypropylene composites. Composites Science and Technology, 72(10), 1160–1166.
5. [5] Faruk, O., et al. (2012). Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(11), 1552–1596.
6. [6] John, M. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(3), 343–364.
7. [7] Ku, H., et al. (2011). A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B, 42(4), 856–873.
8. [8] Mariatti, M., & Khalil, H. P. S. A. (2009). Effect of laminate configuration on tensile and flexural properties of glass and carbon reinforced epoxy. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 28(9), 1153–1163.
9. [9] Mwaikambo, L. Y., & Ansell, M. P. (2002). Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 84(12), 2222–2234.
10. [10] Nishino, T., et al. (2004). Kenaf reinforced biodegradable composite. Composites Science and Technology, 63(9), 1281–1286.
11. [11] Ochi, S. (2008). Mechanical properties of kenaf fibers and kenaf/PLA composites. Mechanics of Materials, 40(4–5), 446–452.
12. [12] Pilla, S. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of bioplastics and biocomposites engineering applications. Wiley-Scrivener.
13. [13] Rong, M. Z., et al. (2001). The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology, 61(10), 1437–1447.
14. [14] Sathishkumar, T. P., Navaneethakrishnan, P., & Shankar, S. (2012). Tensile and flexural properties of snake grass natural fiber reinforced isophthallic polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology, 72(10), 1183–1190.
15. [15] Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. (2003). Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology, 63(9), 1259–1264.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.