International Journal of
Advanced Multidisciplinary Application

Volume 3, Issue 5

• Author(s)Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
• AffiliationDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
• Page No.79-85
• Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 5, May 2026
• Published On2026/05/14
• JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
• ISSN No.3048-9350
• DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20365787

Abstract

Aluminium–Silicon Carbide (Al–SiC) metal matrix composites (MMCs) have attracted considerable industrial interest owing to their superior specific strength, stiffness, and wear resistance relative to unreinforced aluminium alloys, making them particularly attractive for weight-sensitive automotive structural components including suspension arms, brake rotors, and engine mounts. However, the fatigue life and tribological behaviour of Al–SiC MMCs fabricated by stir casting — a commercially scalable and cost-effective processing route — remain insufficiently characterised under multi-axial loading and elevated temperature conditions representative of in-service automotive environments. This study fabricates Al 6061 alloy reinforced with SiC particulates at 5 wt%, 10 wt%, 15 wt%, and 20 wt% via double-pass stir casting at 750°C with electromagnetic stirring and characterises the resulting composites through tensile testing, rotating-bending fatigue testing (R = –1, 10⁶ to 10⁸ cycle range), pin-on-disc tribological assessment under dry and lubricated conditions, and fractographic analysis by SEM. The effect of SiC reinforcement fraction on S–N fatigue behaviour, wear rate, coefficient of friction, and failure mode is systematically quantified. Results confirm that 15 wt% SiC addition yields the optimal fatigue endurance limit (172 MPa, 38% above unreinforced control at 10⁷ cycles) while maintaining acceptable ductility (elongation 4.2%). The 20 wt% SiC composite exhibits the lowest specific wear rate (2.4 × 10⁻⁵ mm³/N·m) under dry sliding, representing a 61% reduction versus the matrix alloy. SEM fractography reveals a transition from transgranular fatigue cracking in low-SiC composites to interfacial debonding-dominated fracture at 20 wt% SiC, with implications for optimum reinforcement content selection in fatigue-critical designs.

Keywords: metal matrix composites, Al-SiC, stir casting, fatigue behaviour, tribology, wear resistance, SEM fractography, automotive materials, S-N curve, Al 6061

References

1. [1] Agarwala, V. S., & Ray, S. (1989). Mechanical properties of SiC-reinforced Al composites. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 8(9), 1063–1065.
2. [2] Chawla, N., & Chawla, K. K. (2006). Metal Matrix Composites. Springer, New York.
3. [3] Dixit, P., & Das, S. (2018). Tribological behaviour of Al–SiC composites under dry sliding. Tribology International, 117, 43–51.
4. [4] Ghosh, P. K., & Ray, S. (1988). Fabrication of cast Al-alloy-SiC particle composite by compocasting. Indian Foundry Journal, 34(3), 18–27.
5. [5] Gupta, M., & Sharon, N. M. L. (2010). Magnesium, Magnesium Alloys, and Magnesium Composites. Wiley, New Jersey.
6. [6] Hashim, J., Looney, L., & Hashmi, M. S. J. (1999). Metal matrix composites: production by the stir casting method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 92–93, 1–7.
7. [7] Kök, M. (2005). Production and mechanical properties of Al₂O₃ particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 161(3), 381–387.
8. [8] Mehta, P., Srivastava, R. K., & Pandey, A. C. (2024). Effect of double-pass stirring on SiC distribution uniformity in Al 6061 composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 82(2), 341–348.
9. [9] Miracle, D. B. (2005). Metal matrix composites — From science to technological significance. Composites Science and Technology, 65(15–16), 2526–2540.
10. [10] Narayanasamy, R., Ramesh, T., & Prabhakar, M. (2010). Effect of SiC particle reinforcement on microstructural and mechanical properties of composites. Materials and Design, 31(7), 3375–3382.
11. [11] Rajan, T. P. D., Pillai, R. M., & Pai, B. C. (1998). Reinforcement coatings and interfaces in aluminium metal matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science, 33(14), 3491–3503.
12. [12] Rohatgi, P. K. (1993). Cast aluminium-matrix composites for automotive applications. JOM, 45(4), 10–14.
13. [13] Suresh, S., Mortensen, A., & Needleman, A. (1993). Fundamentals of Metal Matrix Composites. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
14. [14] Torralba, J. M., da Costa, C. E., & Velasco, F. (2003). P/M aluminium matrix composites: an overview. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 133(1–2), 203–206.
15. [15] Uyyuru, R. K., Surappa, M. K., & Brusethaug, S. (2006). Effect of reinforcement volume fraction and size distribution on the tribological behaviour of Al-composite/brake pad tribo-couple. Wear, 260(11–12), 1248–1255.
16. [16] Yılmaz, O., & Buytoz, S. (2001). Abrasive wear of Al₂O₃-reinforced aluminium-based MMCs. Composites Science and Technology, 61(16), 2381–2392.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.