Open Access DOI Assigned

Glycaemic Control, Self-Care Practices and Structured Education among Type 2 Diabetics in South India

Volume 3, Issue 3

  • Author(s)Elena Marchetti
  • AffiliationDepartment of Diabetology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Page No.98-103
  • Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 3, March 2026
  • Published On2026/03/25
  • JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
  • ISSN No.3048-9350
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19334422
Article Indexing

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) constitutes a substantial and escalating public health burden across India, with South Indian states exhibiting some of the highest age-standardised prevalence rates in the nation, driven by a convergence of rapid dietary transition, declining physical activity, genetic susceptibility, and urbanisation. This study investigates the determinants of glycaemic control among T2DM patients attending outpatient diabetic clinics in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, examining the role of structured diabetes education programmes in modifying self-care behaviours and improving HbA1c outcomes over a six-month intervention period.
The study enrolled 4,218 participants across twelve clinical sites stratified by urban, peri-urban, and rural location. Baseline HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, BMI, blood pressure, and lipid profiles were recorded, along with validated self-care scores across dietary adherence, physical activity, medication compliance, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care domains. Participants in the intervention arm received a structured twelve-session Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) programme delivered by trained diabetes nurse educators and dieticians, with motivational interviewing components incorporated after session four.
At six-month follow-up, intervention arm participants showed a mean HbA1c reduction of 1.9 percentage points compared to 0.4 in the control arm (p<0.001). Self-care scores improved significantly across all five domains in the intervention group. Multivariable logistic regression identified rural residence, sedentary lifestyle, family history, and overweight as independent risk factors for poor glycaemic control, while DSME completion emerged as the strongest protective predictor (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.69). The study provides evidence for scaling structured patient education in primary and secondary care settings across South India as a cost-effective strategy for improving population-level glycaemic outcomes.

Keywords: Type 2 Diabetes, glycaemic control, HbA1c, self-care, diabetes education, DSME, South India, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, public health

References

  1. [1] American Diabetes Association. (2024). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Supplement 1), S1-S321.
  2. [2] Bansal, N. (2015). Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment: A review. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(2), 296-303.
  3. [3] Chrvala, C. A., Sherr, D., & Lipman, R. D. (2016). Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(6), 926-943.
  4. [4] Garg, C. C., & Khan, S. A. (2010). Burden of disease study: Non-communicable diseases in India. NIHFW, New Delhi.
  5. [5] IDF. (2023). IDF Diabetes Atlas, 11th Edition. International Diabetes Federation, Brussels.
  6. [6] Kalra, S., Aamir, A. H., & Raza, S. A. (2017). Place of sulfonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia: A consensus statement. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21(4), 510-518.
  7. [7] Marchetti, E., Ferri, M., & Bertaccini, A. (2022). Motivational interviewing in chronic disease management: Adaptation for multicultural settings. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 45(3), 418-432.
  8. [8] Mohan, V., Sandeep, S., Deepa, R., Shah, B., & Varghese, C. (2007). Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: Indian scenario. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 125(3), 217-230.
  9. [9] NPCDCS. (2023). National Programme for Non-Communicable Diseases: Annual Report 2022-23. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.
  10. [10] Rajendran, P., & Krishnamurthy, D. (2022). Structured diabetes education in community settings: Pilot findings from Tamil Nadu. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(8), 4312-4319.
  11. [11] Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., & Shetty, A. S. (2012). Trends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries. World Journal of Diabetes, 3(6), 110-117.
  12. [12] Shetty, S., & Thomas, T. (2019). Self-management of diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 6(4), 1639-1648.
  13. [13] Toobert, D. J., Hampson, S. E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2000). The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure. Diabetes Care, 23(7), 943-950.
  14. [14] Unnikrishnan, R., Pradeepa, R., Joshi, S. R., & Mohan, V. (2017). Type 2 diabetes: Demystifying the global epidemic. Diabetes, 66(6), 1432-1442.
  15. [15] WHO. (2023). Global Report on Diabetes. World Health Organization, Geneva.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.