Open Access DOI Assigned

High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate Continuous Exercise — Effects on VO₂max, Lactate Threshold, Heart Rate Variability, and Body Composition in Sedentary Adults

Volume 3, Issue 4

  • Author(s)Erik Andersen, Fiona MacLeod, Lukas Becker, Caterina Esposito
  • AffiliationDepartment of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
  • Page No.97-103
  • Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 4, April 2026
  • Published On2026/04/09
  • JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
  • ISSN No.3048-9350
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19484289
Article Indexing

Abstract

Physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality, and the promotion of effective, time-efficient exercise modalities is a public health priority. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), offering comparable or superior cardiovascular and metabolic benefits in shorter training durations. However, comparative evidence from well-powered randomised trials with comprehensive physiological outcome batteries — encompassing cardiorespiratory fitness (VO₂max), lactate threshold, cardiac autonomic function (heart rate variability), and body composition — assessed across multiple exercise modalities simultaneously is limited. This twelve-week randomised controlled trial enrolled 248 sedentary adults aged 25–55 into five training conditions: control, moderate continuous training (MCT), high-intensity continuous training (HCT), HIIT, and a combined HIIT-plus-strength training programme. HIIT produced the largest improvement in VO₂max (+12.4 mL/kg/min; p<0.001), while the combined HIIT-plus-strength condition achieved the most favourable composite outcome including VO₂max improvement (+14.4 mL/kg/min), largest lean mass gain (+3.2 kg), greatest fat mass reduction (−5.1%), and strongest heart rate variability increase (RMSSD +24.0 ms). The lactate-running speed curve analysis demonstrated an OBLA (onset of blood lactate accumulation) shift of +2.4 km/h in the HIIT group versus +0.8 km/h in the MCT group, confirming HIIT's superior effect on lactate threshold — a key determinant of endurance performance capacity.

Keywords: HIIT, VO₂max, lactate threshold, heart rate variability, body composition, exercise physiology, cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary adults, interval training, sports science

References

  1. [1] Andersen, E., MacLeod, F., & Esposito, C. (2022). Combined HIIT and resistance training in sedentary adults: Two-year adherence and cardiovascular outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 32(8), 1284–1298.
  2. [2] Buchheit, M., & Laursen, P. B. (2013). High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Sports Medicine, 43(5), 313–338.
  3. [3] Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., Macdonald, M. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2012). Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. Journal of Physiology, 590(5), 1077–1084.
  4. [4] Helgerud, J., Høydal, K., Wang, E., et al. (2007). Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39(4), 665–671.
  5. [5] Hussain, S. R., Macaluso, A., & Pearson, S. J. (2016). High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in the prevention/management of cardiovascular disease. Cardiology Reviews, 24(6), 273–281.
  6. [6] Laursen, P. B., & Jenkins, D. G. (2002). The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training. Sports Medicine, 32(1), 53–73.
  7. [7] Milanović, Z., Sporiš, G., & Weston, M. (2015). Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIT) and continuous endurance training for VO2max improvements. Sports Medicine, 45(10), 1469–1481.
  8. [8] Rognmo, Ø., Hetland, E., Helgerud, J., Hoff, J., & Slørdahl, S. A. (2004). High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 11(3), 216–222.
  9. [9] Scharhag-Rosenberger, F., Meyer, T., Gässler, N., Faude, O., & Kindermann, W. (2010). Exercise at given percentages of VO2max. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(7), 507–514.
  10. [10] Trilk, J. L., Singhal, A., Bigelman, K. A., & Cureton, K. J. (2011). Effect of sprint interval training on circulatory function during exercise in sedentary, overweight/obese women. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(8), 1591–1597.
  11. [11] Verkhoshansky, Y., & Siff, M. (2009). Supertraining. Verkhoshansky SSTM, Rome.
  12. [12] Weston, K. S., Wisløff, U., & Coombes, J. S. (2014). High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(16), 1227–1234.
  13. [13] WHO. (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  14. [14] Wilson, J. M., Marin, P. J., Rhea, M. R., et al. (2012). Concurrent training: A meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(8), 2293–2307.
  15. [15] Wisløff, U., Støylen, A., Loennechen, J. P., et al. (2007). Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients. Circulation, 115(24), 3086–3094.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.