Open Access DOI Assigned

IoT-Enabled Precision Irrigation Management Using Soil Moisture Sensor Networks and Machine Learning-Based Evapotranspiration Prediction

Volume 3, Issue 3

  • Author(s)Padma Reddy Narayanappa, Suryanarayana Rao Kondapalli
  • Affiliation¹Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India ²Department of Agronomy, Sri Konda Laxman Telangana State Horticultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Page No.56-59
  • Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 3, March 2026
  • Published On2026/02/08
  • JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
  • ISSN No.3048-9350
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18931200
Article Indexing

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture accounts for approximately 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, yet irrigation water use efficiency in traditional flood irrigation seldom exceeds 40–50%. The convergence of IoT sensor technology, wireless communication, cloud computing, and machine learning presents a transformative opportunity to improve agricultural water use efficiency through real-time precision irrigation management. This study presents the design, implementation, and two-season field validation of an IoT-enabled precision irrigation management system (IoT-PIMS) for rain-fed rice cultivation in semi-arid agro-climatic zones of Telangana, India. The system integrates a wireless sensor network of 144 soil moisture sensors, automated weather stations, LoRaWAN communication, and a cloud-hosted Random Forest ET₀ prediction model trained on 12 years of IMD weather data, with a fuzzy logic irrigation decision engine delivering recommendations via SMS and Android app. Two-season field trials (Kharif 2023 and Rabi 2023–24) across three sites demonstrated: 31.4% water use reduction relative to conventional flood irrigation; paddy yield improvement from 5.21 to 5.84 t/ha; water use efficiency improvement from 0.41 to 0.67 kg grain/m³ (+63.4%); ET₀ prediction RMSE of 0.31 mm/day (NSE=0.89); and system uptime of 97.4%. Farmer perception surveys indicate 84.6% willingness to continue using IoT-PIMS.

Keywords: precision irrigation, IoT sensors, soil moisture monitoring, machine learning, evapotranspiration prediction, random forest, LoRaWAN, rice cultivation, water use efficiency, semi-arid agriculture, India, Telangana, smart farming, fuzzy logic

References

  1. [1] Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration – FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56.
  2. [2] Bwambale, E., Abagale, F. K., & Anornu, G. K. (2022). Smart irrigation monitoring and control strategies. Agricultural Water Management, 260, 107324.
  3. [3] FAO. (2018). The Future of Food and Agriculture – Alternative Pathways to 2050.
  4. [4] Goap, A., Sharma, D., Shukla, A. K., & Rama Krishna, C. (2018). An IoT based smart irrigation management system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 155, 41–49.
  5. [5] Kumar, S., Singh, A., & Sharma, P. (2021). IoT-based smart drip irrigation for tomato cultivation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India), 58(3), 112–121.
  6. [6] Lampayan, R. M., Rejesus, R. M., Singleton, G. R., & Bouman, B. A. M. (2015). Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management. Field Crops Research, 170, 95–108.
  7. [7] Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674.
  8. [8] Patel, V., & Gupta, M. (2023). Comparative evaluation of ML algorithms for ET₀ prediction. Agricultural Water Management, 281, 108245.
  9. [9] Sharma, R., Yadav, K., & Mishra, A. (2022). Sensor-based precision irrigation for water saving in wheat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(5), 567–573.
  10. [10] Vellidis, G., Tucker, M., Perry, C., Kvien, C., & Bednarz, C. (2008). A real-time wireless smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 61(1), 44–50.
  11. [11] Feng, Y., Cui, N., Zhao, L., et al. (2017). Comparison of ELM, GANN, WNN models for ET₀ estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 536, 376–383.
  12. [12] Kisi, O., & Cimen, M. (2011). A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 399(1-2), 132–140.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.