International Journal of
Advanced Multidisciplinary Application

Volume 3, Issue 4

• Author(s)David Hartmann, Ingrid Skovdal, Álvaro Medina
• AffiliationDepartment of Renewable Energy Systems and Photovoltaics, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, Germany
• Page No.90-96
• Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 4, April 2026
• Published On2026/04/09
• JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
• ISSN No.3048-9350
• DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19484239

Article Indexing

Abstract

The European Union's REPowerEU plan targets 600 GW of installed solar photovoltaic capacity by 2030, requiring an unprecedented acceleration in deployment across diverse climatic, regulatory, and grid-integration contexts. The long-term techno-economic performance of photovoltaic installations — encompassing annual energy yield, performance ratio, degradation rate, and levelised cost of energy — varies substantially across panel technologies, mounting configurations, and geographic locations in ways that are not fully captured by short-term laboratory measurements or manufacturer specifications. This study presents a five-year field performance assessment of 84 photovoltaic installations across Germany, Spain, and Sweden, covering three panel technologies — monocrystalline silicon (mono-Si), polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si), and cadmium telluride thin-film (CdTe) — and three mounting configurations — fixed tilt, single-axis tracking, and dual-axis tracking.
Mono-Si fixed-tilt systems demonstrated the highest mean performance ratio (PR=0.84 at installation, declining to 0.80 at sixty months), while CdTe thin-film showed the lowest degradation rate (0.3% per year vs. 0.5% for mono-Si and 0.5% for poly-Si). Single-axis tracking increased annual energy yield by 18.4–22.6% over fixed tilt across all technologies. LCOE for the best-performing configuration (single-axis mono-Si) reached EUR 34.2/MWh at the German sites under current financing conditions — competitive with all conventional generation sources and enabling direct grid parity across all study locations without subsidy

Keywords: photovoltaics, solar energy, performance ratio, degradation rate, LCOE, mono-Si, thin-film, single-axis tracking, REPowerEU, energy transition

References

1. [1] Benda, V., & Černá, L. (2020). PV cells and modules: State of the art, limits and trends. Heliyon, 6(12), e05666.
2. [2] Branker, K., Pathak, M. J. M., & Pearce, J. M. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4470–4482.
3. [3] European Commission. (2022). REPowerEU Plan. Communication COM(2022) 230. Brussels.
4. [4] Fraunhofer ISE. (2023). Photovoltaics Report. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, Freiburg.
5. [5] Hartmann, D., Skovdal, I., & Medina, Á. (2023). Performance ratio decline mechanisms in mono-Si PV systems: Five-year field evidence from German monitoring network. Solar Energy, 258, 142–154.
6. [6] IEA. (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. International Energy Agency, Paris.
7. [7] Jordan, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2013). Photovoltaic degradation rates — An analytical review. Progress in Photovoltaics, 21(1), 12–29.
8. [8] Kymakis, E., Kalykakis, S., & Papazoglou, T. M. (2009). Performance analysis of a grid connected photovoltaic park on the island of Crete. Energy Conversion and Management, 50(3), 433–438.
9. [9] Medina, Á., Hartmann, D., & Skovdal, I. (2022). Comparative field performance of CdTe thin-film and crystalline silicon PV in Mediterranean climate. Progress in Photovoltaics, 30(8), 842–856.
10. [10] Ndiaye, A., Kébé, C. M. F., Charki, A., et al. (2013). Photovoltaic voltage-induced degradation: A case study on a 2 MW power plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 75, 449–455.
11. [11] Reich, N. H., Mueller, B., Armbruster, A., et al. (2012). Performance ratio revisited: Is PR > 90% realistic? Progress in Photovoltaics, 20(6), 717–726.
12. [12] Skovdal, I., Medina, Á., & Hartmann, D. (2023). Single-axis tracking yield advantage across Northern European irradiance climates: A five-year empirical analysis. Renewable Energy, 214, 284–296.
13. [13] Theristis, M., Makrides, G., Livera, A., et al. (2020). Irradiance-dependent photovoltaic losses caused by urban pollution. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 10(4), 1018–1026.
14. [14] Virtuani, A., Pavanello, D., & Friesen, G. (2010). Overview of temperature coefficients of different thin film photovoltaic technologies. In 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia.
15. [15] Wirth, H. (2023). Recent Facts about Photovoltaics in Germany. Fraunhofer ISE, Freiburg.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.