Open Access DOI Assigned

Progressive Resistance Training versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise for Glycaemic Control, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Insulin Sensitivity, and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Volume 3, Issue 4

  • Author(s)Meenakshi P., Rajesh Gopinathan, Lakshmi N.
  • AffiliationDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Exercise Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
  • Page No.118-122
  • Volume, Issue & YearVolume 3, Issue 4, April 2026
  • Published On2026/04/21
  • JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Application (IJAMA)
  • ISSN No.3048-9350
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19682026
Article Indexing

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 101 million adults in India, constituting the world's largest absolute diabetes burden, with exercise therapy representing an underutilised yet evidence-supported pillar of glycaemic management alongside pharmacological intervention. While aerobic exercise is the traditional guideline-endorsed exercise modality for T2DM, progressive resistance training (PRT) offers mechanistically distinct pathways to glycaemic improvement through skeletal muscle glucose transporter (GLUT4) upregulation, increased insulin-independent glucose disposal via skeletal muscle mass accretion, and enhanced basal metabolic rate. Comparative evidence from well-powered trials in the Indian population — who demonstrate the 'thin-fat' phenotype characterised by low muscle mass and high adiposity at moderate BMI — is lacking. This sixteen-week randomised controlled trial enrolled 280 adults with T2DM (aged 35–65 years, HbA1c 7.0–10.0%) across three JIPMER-affiliated diabetes clinics in Puducherry and Tamil Nadu, randomised to Progressive Resistance Training (PRT, n=95), Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise (MIAE, n=95), or Combined PRT plus MIAE (COMB, n=90). The COMB group achieved the greatest HbA1c reduction (−1.6%, p<0.001) and combined skeletal muscle index improvement (+1.4 kg/m²) with fat mass reduction (−4.8%). PRT alone produced superior skeletal muscle mass gains (+1.8 kg lean mass) and HOMA-IR improvement (−2.4 units) compared to MIAE alone, while MIAE achieved greater VO₂max improvement (+6.8 mL/kg/min). These results challenge the aerobic-exercise primacy in T2DM guidelines and support PRT as an equally effective and potentially more appropriate exercise modality for the low muscle mass Indian diabetic phenotype.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, progressive resistance training, aerobic exercise, glycaemic control, skeletal muscle mass, insulin sensitivity, GLUT4, HOMA-IR, South Asian phenotype, exercise therapy

References

  1. [1] American Diabetes Association. (2024). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes — 2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Suppl 1), S77–S110.
  2. [2] Bweir, S., Al-Jarrah, M., Almalty, A. M., et al. (2009). Resistance exercise training lowers HbA1c more than aerobic training in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, 1(1), 27.
  3. [3] Church, T. S., Blair, S. N., Cocreham, S., et al. (2010). Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA, 304(20), 2253–2262.
  4. [4] Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Yardley, J. E., et al. (2016). Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 39(11), 2065–2079.
  5. [5] Grontved, A., Rimm, E. B., Willett, W. C., et al. (2012). A prospective study of weight training and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(17), 1306–1312.
  6. [6] IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th Edition. (2021). International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
  7. [7] Ishiguro, H., Kodama, S., Horikawa, C., et al. (2016). In search of the ideal resistance training program to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Sports Medicine, 46(1), 67–77.
  8. [8] Joshi, S. R., & Mohan, V. (2018). Pros and cons of the Indian diabetes diet. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(7), 47.
  9. [9] Misra, A., Tandon, N., Bhatt, S., et al. (2016). Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of metabolic syndrome in India. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 64(6), 47–55.
  10. [10] Mohan, V., Anjana, R. M., Deepa, M., et al. (2023). Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: ICMR-INDIAB national cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 11(7), 474–489.
  11. [11] Sigal, R. J., Kenny, G. P., Boule, N. G., et al. (2007). Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(6), 357–369.
  12. [12] Strasser, B., Siebert, U., & Schobersberger, W. (2010). Resistance training in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Sports Medicine, 40(5), 397–415.
  13. [13] Umpierre, D., Ribeiro, P. A., Kramer, C. K., et al. (2011). Physical activity advice or structured exercise training and HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes. JAMA, 305(17), 1790–1799.
  14. [14] Yardley, J. E., Kenny, G. P., Perkins, B. A., et al. (2013). Resistance versus aerobic exercise: Acute effects on glycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 36(3), 537–542.
  15. [15] WHO. (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. World Health Organization, Geneva.

Explore Our Related Journals

Looking for the right journal for your next manuscript? Explore our international peer-reviewed journals covering engineering, management, computer science, artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary research.